FANDOM


(Mob Abilities)
(Diabolo's Shard: new section)
Line 70: Line 70:
 
:::Patrol and rollback functions seem to work again. --[[User:Melios|Melios]] 22:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 
:::Patrol and rollback functions seem to work again. --[[User:Melios|Melios]] 22:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 
::::Yep. Good thing you edit so much, otherwise I wouldn't have noticed so quickly.<!--Although I don't have room to talk lol--> --{{User:Charitwo/Sig}} 00:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 
::::Yep. Good thing you edit so much, otherwise I wouldn't have noticed so quickly.<!--Although I don't have room to talk lol--> --{{User:Charitwo/Sig}} 00:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Diabolo's Shard ==
  +
  +
You have [http://wiki.ffxiclopedia.org/index.php?title=Diabolos%27s_Shard&curid=78628&diff=521993&oldid=476845 confirmation] that it's indeed an avatar? I always see it in the chat log but have yet to actually physically see it long enough to see ''what'' it is. --{{User:Charitwo/Sig}} 04:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:09, May 12, 2008

Hello Melios! Welcome to FFXIclopedia! Thank you for joining our community. Here are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Best of luck. Have fun! - FFXIclopedia Administrators
Getting Started
FFXIclopedia Community
Community Projects
Wiki Editing
Frequently Used Templates
Policies & Guidelines
FFXIclopedia Policies
Editing Policies

Bot Policy
Drop Rate Policy
File Policy
Link Policy
Naming Conventions
Prohibited Articles
Quiz Policy
Software Limitations
Userbox Policy

Community Policies

Appropriate Behavior
Inappropriate Behavior
Content Control & Article Ownership
User Pages
User Signatures
What FFXIclopedia is not

Administrator Related

Administrators
Article Protection
Guide to Deletion
Vandal Reports

Legal Policies

Copyrights
General Disclaimer
Privacy Policy

Policy Templates

{{Edit Wars}}
{{Vandalism}}
{{Replacing Images}}
{{Gallery Pics}}
{{Video warn}}
{{Quizzes}}
{{Comments}}
{{Images}} • {{User Pics}}
{{Show Preview}}
{{Signature}}


Note

You're doing some real good work, I checked your contribs and you're over the 1000 mark. You can put {{1,000 Contributor}} on your userpage if you didn't already know about it :) --CharitwoTalk 23:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, question about Republican Legion's Fourth Divison, is it supposed to be Fourth Division? --CharitwoTalk 23:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't know exactly. I was simply looking at WOTG mission 2's page and added in these details. If you think it should just be "Fourth Division," go ahead and rename it. --FFXI-Melios 23:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Don't want to be too hasty if it's wrong, you can verify it if you want. It'd be more of a hassle to move it and have to move it back than just guessed and left it there wrong. --CharitwoTalk 23:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, I don't know really, I'm aligned with Windurst. I just wanted to fill in some campaign related details. Maybe "Repiblican Legion's" is a little redundant in name. --FFXI-Melios 23:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Categories

Please do not add categories to pages in which they do not belong. Thanks. --CharitwoTalk 23:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

They're not HNM's....? --FFXI-Melios 23:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
No. --CharitwoTalk 23:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Well that's just confusing......so how are the Seiyin and beastman leaders not HNM's? --FFXI-Melios 23:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Gods have never been HNMs, and neither have the Beastmen leaders. The factors between mobs such as Absolute Virtue, Tiamat, Nidhogg, etc. in terms of manning, strength, abilities, and rewards are beyond comparison. --CharitwoTalk 23:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
That's quite different from what I've always understood. --FFXI-Melios 23:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
How are Beastmen Gods not HNM i.e. Overlord Bakgodek, Za'Dha Adamantking and Tzee Xicu the Manifest since they pop only once every 2-9+ days from a lotto of there NQ versions which can also be considered HNM since they are on a 24 hour pop. Is the definition of HNM something that has changed over the years? I have been playing since NA release and those Beastmen Gods have always been considered HNM, at the same time the Zilart Beastmen leaders have not since they have no HQ version and there drops stink anyways (Ocean Sahagin, Antican Consul and Tonberry Pontifex), so is there a more strict guideline that decides what is a HNM and what is not? since all the NM listed take more then 1 lvl 75 to kill and there attacks are much higher then a normal lvl 75 mob or NM and they pop on a 21-24 hour timer or longer depending on there lotto pop, yes I know that the NM versions of the Beastmen Gods can be solo-ed since I have done Orc and Qudav many times solo just to keep ToD. Also you don't have Cemetery Cherry listed as a HNM in which case why not? it pops every 60-72 hours once the Cherry Saplings are killed (the pop after that time mentioned) just as if King Arthro were popped and yet KA is a HNM isn't it? The level of KA might not be as high as other HNM but it is a HNM none the less from when the level cap was lower, only a very few of us remember those days. Serket is a HNM too, and I can solo that, Genbu is a God and people consider those HMNs (maybe not you Charitwo but many do), I can solo that one to so I am not seeing the definition of HNM. I am going to edit the page for Cherry and others to be a HNM for the time being. Brysky 23:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't know honestly, but that's more of a discussion for the talk page on the HNM category. --Melios 01:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Patroller

Per a discussion amongst myself and most of the other admins, we've agreed that you deserve the right of Patroller for your contributions here. All your edits will be auto-patrolled (meaning we don't need to check them, you make good edits), you can patrol the edits of others (notice the red ! in recent changes) to ensure they are correct and vandalism free, if so you may choose to [mark as patrolled]. If you see vandalism or other bad faith edits, you also have the ability to roll them back, as can be found on diff, contributions, and history pages. Congrats and thanks for everything you do around here. :) --CharitwoTalk 00:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Problem with old Username

Hi, that's weird, shouldn't have happened. have you tried requesting a new password for the old account? May help. If not, drop me a line. TOR@fandom 17:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Err...how do you request a new password? --Melios 18:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

You can change your password from "My preferences". --Chrisjander t/ c 21:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

  • For the old account...? --Melios 00:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Nevermind, I figured out what I needed to do. --Melios 04:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Congrats! I finally got your FFXI- prefix removed! :) --CharitwoTalk 23:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Jakoh

Was there something you wanted to change on this page? --CharitwoTalk 22:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Well, mostly to properly list which missions/quests were involved, but since the Vana'diel Profiles article was left directly on the page (as opposed to being put into a subpage like Kam'lanaut and Tzee Xicu), that wasn't possible due to protection lock. --Melios 23:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Go for it, put done in the edit summary to let me know when you're finished. --CharitwoTalk 23:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, done, though I still think you should consider splitting the article to a subpage like with the other two I mentioned. --Melios 23:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Mob Abilities

I know you're a big contributor to the creation of articles for mob abilities and spells, when you have some time, I was wondering if you could please review the new pages created here and "un-stubify" them the best you can. --CharitwoTalk 21:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I thought you guys didn't want individual monster TP ability pages, but if you've changed your mind, then alright, I'll just base it on weaponskill/spell pages. --Melios 23:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
The reason for that mainly is because they're...like the aforementioned, a short sentence with 1 link. But you're pretty good with adding pages like these, and since you've already had added spells, these aren't going to hurt anything. --CharitwoTalk 23:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I guess we may as well get monster ability pages up, but it will take time to sort them out. --Melios 00:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I just polished up the Behemoth special abilities pages. I used a "Mob Abilities" category since I didn't think they belonged under Spells (being TP moves) or Weapon Skills (not usable by players). Unless you think they should be bundled with weapon skills? --Melios 00:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Nah, the category works. --CharitwoTalk 00:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Please try to keep colons inside: the bold to conform to the conventions here. --CharitwoTalk 23:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Check out Talk:Lethargic Daze when ya get a chance. --CharitwoTalk 22:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

rights

I'm sure you've noticed your edits are no longer auto-patrolled (working on this issue now), do you still have the ability to rollback edits? It seems the JrSysop and patroller usergroup disappeared with the addition of the social features. --CharitwoTalk 01:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

No, rollback option is gone. --Melios 01:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. Trying to get these rights restored asap. --CharitwoTalk 01:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Patrol and rollback functions seem to work again. --Melios 22:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Yep. Good thing you edit so much, otherwise I wouldn't have noticed so quickly. --CharitwoTalk 00:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Diabolo's Shard

You have confirmation that it's indeed an avatar? I always see it in the chat log but have yet to actually physically see it long enough to see what it is. --CharitwoTalk 04:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.