FANDOM


 
(25 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Someone revert the edit Valyana made, it now makes the page useless to find out a skillchain if you have to keep going back and forth between pages. --[[User:Zero|Zero]] 18:55, 20 Jan 2006 (PST)
 
----
 
Do you have another suggestion for how to split up the page? None of my browsers were capable of editing the page as it was. If someone else is able to put back the elemental attributes section, I have no objection, but please don't revert my other changes. --[[User:Valyana|Valyana]] 23:37, 20 Jan 2006 (PST)
 
----
 
Oh hell I don't mind the changes you made to the top, but I feel having the elemental attributes on the same page is really handy (Though, the order needs to be fixed). I will see what I can do about putting the elemental charts back onto the same page. --[[User:Zero|Zero]] 02:31, 21 Jan 2006 (PST)
 
 
==Chart Changes==
 
Yeah, they look better, but I don't really like the idea of having two collums. Also, would you mind including colors? It would help me recognize which elements are what a lot quicker. --[[User:Zero|Zero]] 15:24, 17 Feb 2006 (PST)
 
== Done==
 
Well I kep the 2 columns, but that can be undone if needed. I really don't use skill chains at all as a BST, so I don't know if the rest of the article can be shortened anywhere, but at least this gets the information that was moved back in a shortened version. Hope it can be edited as is. --[[User:Gahoo|Gahoo]] 11:37, 22 February 2006 --[[User:Valyana|Valyana]] 12:30, 1 March 2006 (PST)(PST)
 
 
== Wpn Skill charts ==
 
 
Looks excellent, except for a few weapons that have skills with long names. Those charts that have them aren't aligned properly on all resolutions, one of the easiest to see is the chart for Hand-to-hand. Shoulder Tackle, One Inch Punch, and Spinning Attack are all too long to keep to one line. While this would be fine normally, the rest of the chart doesn't word wrap with it, so the alignments are all off. When I have the time after work, Ima play with the chart to see if I can't make it look the same, but set the rows into alignment for all screens. If someone wants to try this before I do, please go ahead.
 
 
--[[User:Chrisjander|Chrisjander]] 12:01, 22 February 2006 (PST)
 
 
I've now got a test chart on my talk page that has the basic two column format, and all the info, but now its rows are aligned. I used Greatsword and Hand-to-Hand as examples because they were two of the weapons with the longest names. Take a look and tell me what you think. [[User talk:Chrisjander]]
 
 
--[[User:Chrisjander|Chrisjander]] 13:51, 22 February 2006 (PST)
 
 
Looks fine to me. Thanks. --[[User:Gahoo|Gahoo]] 14:10, 22 February 2006 (PST)
 
 
The new tables look good, but I notice that the contents differ significantly from Aden's chart, which I'm inclined to trust more. For instance, I know that Full Swing opens Fusion and closes Liquefaction, but the tables here don't show it as having a Fire element at all. --[[User:Valyana|Valyana]] 12:30, 1 March 2006 (PST)
 
 
 
Heh, I actually have no idea how the tables are supposed to work, I just tried to make it look nicer. I almost always use Aden's chart, since its much easier to read. Since you really only need to know what the weapons you use open and close, and with what, this table would only be for people that don't like Aden's chart, or want to remember the reasons why the weapon skills work. And I'm not entirely sure, but I thought to open a Fire renkai, you didn't need the element in question, but then again, I've already said I dont' know how these charts are supposed to work. --[[User:Chrisjander|Chrisjander]] 12:44, 1 March 2006 (PST)
 
----
 
Well as a BST i don't SC either. I was just trying to put back in the charts since Zero complained aboved about their being moved. --[[User:Gahoo|Gahoo]] 15:42, 1 March 2006 (PST)
 
 
---
 
In case anyone is interested, the way I determined the elemental attributes of all the weapon skills is by looking at where they lie on Aden's chart. Example: Piercing Arrow is in the section that has a nice pretty picture of water behind it (with the 'A' attribute), as well as in the section for light (with a 'B' attribute). Things may very well be wrong at this point - I haven't looked at all this in probably about 2 years...I'm up for taking a look through it all now, but in the future (whenever I decide to go into hiding - I like to do that at times :-P ), now anyone can figure out how to classify them! :-D Just thought I'd share!
 
 
--Rixie--
 

Latest revision as of 13:27, August 27, 2006

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.