Talk:Mog Bonanza 2008/Winning Numbers

Winners

Sign your name here and what you chose if you won!

Rank 4

1. /joy.. I dunno what to pick... ; ; Nally 15:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
2. Let's hope the price of the items doesn't drop too fast :o --Vuclutout 15:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
3. My mule Aang won one rank 4 prize. I'll be watching item prices as well. Fiorenzo 15:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
4. This is my highest prize. I'm picking the Empress Hairpin and selling my Emperor. Stammer 15:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Rank 5

1. My Prize, yay! --User:Charitwo/Sig 15:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
2. /cheer for crap exp lol lego 15:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
3. Woot, XP for me... --Nega 15:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
4. My main char, and two or three of my mules, got one rank 5 prize each. Useless on my mules, and the one on my main just balances out the fact that I forgot to do the Sacrarium exp scroll quest last week. >.> Fiorenzo 15:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
5. Woo-hoo. 1k EXP for 10k Gil! >.> Ayasu 15:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Winning Numbers...?

OK, I admit, I'm a bit confused.

I read the chart of winning numbers... see, all this time, I thought it'd be a single winning number (ie. a 5-digit number) and the prizes would be based on that. As in, for example, 47396 is the winning number... I'd expected last digit would be 6, last two would be 96, etc.

Glad this was explained clearly... it's more like entering 5 completely different contests than a single contest, really. (Not that I should complain too much, I suppose... I'm winning 100k, but with the way they have the numbers set up, I'd be winning 400k instead if the last 2 of the main number worked. XD) ~X~ JasaniAVA ~X~ | Talk | Contribs 15:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, that was a major shocker to me too. What sucks is I was only one integer off from winning the 10,000,000 gil, which makes me a little sad. You know what they should have done- made the prizes smaller, but the draws more frequent. That way, people would be less frantic to buy a million tickets, the rich players wouldn't care (thus increasing the chances for the poorer players), and the economy would be a lot more stable. Why not a biweekly draw where the grand prize is 1-5,000,000g or something?
--Stammer 15:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)