No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So why not add the comparison page? Seriously. Wiki has just gone continually down hill lately with strict formatting guides being put in place in front of common sense. I understand that what I've changed it back to is a comparison page, and hey, maybe it's just me, but that seems to be the best way to look at them no? If anyone can explain how it's easier to look on three pages for information rather than one then I'll concede that the current format makes sense though --[[User:Blazza|Blazza]] 18:30, November 30, 2010 (UTC) |
So why not add the comparison page? Seriously. Wiki has just gone continually down hill lately with strict formatting guides being put in place in front of common sense. I understand that what I've changed it back to is a comparison page, and hey, maybe it's just me, but that seems to be the best way to look at them no? If anyone can explain how it's easier to look on three pages for information rather than one then I'll concede that the current format makes sense though --[[User:Blazza|Blazza]] 18:30, November 30, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Well it makes sense to me that viewing the Mavi Attire Set page would only show the single tier of armor rather than the +1 or +2. Comparison page is quicker yes, but that's NOT the title of this article. I personally would rather have three different armor pages and a comparison page for those times I'd actually want to see all three sets. What is the harm of following format then going above and beyond? It's not like wiki is going to punch you in the sack for making another page to combine the three set pages together. Make the comparison page and just put links on the original set pages if it's that big of a deal for you. it's just code. [[User:Zetsugan|Zetsugan]] 21:50, November 30, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:50, 30 November 2010
Can I just ask, why the fuck would someone separate this page into three, when all the information was there on one page? Is this another one of those retarded formats that someone has decided should be the same for all job pages, but chosen the harder of them to read instead of the easier one? I'm changing it back, because that's just retarded. --Blazza 09:35, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
I changed the page to comply with the standard page format the wiki seems to use for equipment sets. The page format you're using is more akin to a comparison page. And quite frankly, your post here was just plain rude. -Aranai 21:36, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
So why not add the comparison page? Seriously. Wiki has just gone continually down hill lately with strict formatting guides being put in place in front of common sense. I understand that what I've changed it back to is a comparison page, and hey, maybe it's just me, but that seems to be the best way to look at them no? If anyone can explain how it's easier to look on three pages for information rather than one then I'll concede that the current format makes sense though --Blazza 18:30, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
Well it makes sense to me that viewing the Mavi Attire Set page would only show the single tier of armor rather than the +1 or +2. Comparison page is quicker yes, but that's NOT the title of this article. I personally would rather have three different armor pages and a comparison page for those times I'd actually want to see all three sets. What is the harm of following format then going above and beyond? It's not like wiki is going to punch you in the sack for making another page to combine the three set pages together. Make the comparison page and just put links on the original set pages if it's that big of a deal for you. it's just code. Zetsugan 21:50, November 30, 2010 (UTC)