No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I'm wondering if Guivre should also be marked as sound aggresive. |
+ | I'm wondering if [[Guivre]] should also be marked as sound aggresive. |
| − | I was just leaving a party in Kuftal when somebody got surprised by a hungry wyvern and zoned him to the Western Altepa zoneline. My former party zoned out and I decided I'd stick around and watch for a minute and let them know when it was safe to zone in. |
+ | I was just leaving a party in [[Kuftal Tunnel]] when somebody got surprised by a hungry wyvern and zoned him to the [[Western Altepa Desert]] zoneline. My former party zoned out and I decided I'd stick around and watch for a minute and let them know when it was safe to zone in. |
Everybody zoned and I watched him start to run back to his usual track when he decided to snack on me. I hadn't cast anything on him, and I had already disbanded from the party before I even knew the wyvern was spawned, so I don't think it could have been group aggro. |
Everybody zoned and I watched him start to run back to his usual track when he decided to snack on me. I hadn't cast anything on him, and I had already disbanded from the party before I even knew the wyvern was spawned, so I don't think it could have been group aggro. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Sleep Immunity? == |
== Sleep Immunity? == |
||
| − | Cast Sleep II on it when I saw it today, Resisted me with 66+33 INT & 312 enfeebling (as RDM/NIN). Is it immune or just resistant? |
+ | Cast [[Sleep II]] on it when I saw it today, Resisted me with 66+33 INT & 312 enfeebling (as RDM/NIN). Is it immune or just resistant? |
::: ''Hebrilith'' |
::: ''Hebrilith'' |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Immune to slow? == |
== Immune to slow? == |
||
| − | I've landed Slow II on it with 330+ enfeebling magic fairly consistently. So you can knock that "Immune to Slow" off the main page. ;) |
+ | I've landed [[Slow II]] on it with 330+ enfeebling magic fairly consistently. So you can knock that "Immune to Slow" off the main page. ;) |
::: ''malak'' |
::: ''malak'' |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Double Attack Nullification == |
== Double Attack Nullification == |
||
| − | When fighting Mega Guivre the last 2 times, the Japanese players in my shell told me (THF/NIN) to [[Sneak Attack]] initially and each time after it runs away instead of pulling it regularly. While totally skeptical about this, I used Monomi, SA and Tonko, snuck up on it and exected the maneuver about 15 times successfully between 2 Sandworm encounters. Amazingly enough, it either used [[Double Attack]] much less frequently or not at all (I saw it never use Double Attack after each successful SA engage). |
+ | When fighting Mega [[Guivre]] the last 2 times, the Japanese players in my shell told me (THF/NIN) to [[Sneak Attack]] initially and each time after it runs away instead of pulling it regularly. While totally skeptical about this, I used [[Monomi]], SA and Tonko, snuck up on it and exected the maneuver about 15 times successfully between 2 [[Sandworm]] encounters. Amazingly enough, it either used [[Double Attack]] much less frequently or not at all (I saw it never use [[Double Attack]] after each successful SA engage). |
I'm going to add this to the article, but I'd like confirmation by another group just in case. --[[User:Sfxsigma|Sfxsigma]] 09:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
I'm going to add this to the article, but I'd like confirmation by another group just in case. --[[User:Sfxsigma|Sfxsigma]] 09:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | I also believe that Mega Guivre detects by (not true) sound, requesting confirmation on this also. --[[User:Sfxsigma|Sfxsigma]] 10:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
+ | I also believe that Mega [[Guivre]] detects by (not true) sound, requesting confirmation on this also. --[[User:Sfxsigma|Sfxsigma]] 10:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
I have personally seen it despawn if left unclaimed, removing the verification tag on that |
I have personally seen it despawn if left unclaimed, removing the verification tag on that |
||
Revision as of 17:37, 7 January 2009
I'm wondering if Guivre should also be marked as sound aggresive.
I was just leaving a party in Kuftal Tunnel when somebody got surprised by a hungry wyvern and zoned him to the Western Altepa Desert zoneline. My former party zoned out and I decided I'd stick around and watch for a minute and let them know when it was safe to zone in.
Everybody zoned and I watched him start to run back to his usual track when he decided to snack on me. I hadn't cast anything on him, and I had already disbanded from the party before I even knew the wyvern was spawned, so I don't think it could have been group aggro.
A screenshot of my chatlog from it. http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v292/Tirrock/?action=view¤t=hungrywyvernskill.jpg
Sleep Immunity?
Cast Sleep II on it when I saw it today, Resisted me with 66+33 INT & 312 enfeebling (as RDM/NIN). Is it immune or just resistant?
- Hebrilith
Immune to slow?
I've landed Slow II on it with 330+ enfeebling magic fairly consistently. So you can knock that "Immune to Slow" off the main page. ;)
- malak
Double Attack Nullification
When fighting Mega Guivre the last 2 times, the Japanese players in my shell told me (THF/NIN) to Sneak Attack initially and each time after it runs away instead of pulling it regularly. While totally skeptical about this, I used Monomi, SA and Tonko, snuck up on it and exected the maneuver about 15 times successfully between 2 Sandworm encounters. Amazingly enough, it either used Double Attack much less frequently or not at all (I saw it never use Double Attack after each successful SA engage).
I'm going to add this to the article, but I'd like confirmation by another group just in case. --Sfxsigma 09:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I also believe that Mega Guivre detects by (not true) sound, requesting confirmation on this also. --Sfxsigma 10:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I have personally seen it despawn if left unclaimed, removing the verification tag on that
Atticusu 17:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)