Haldarn

Item article names are the unabbreviated version of what appears in the inventory.

eg In the inventory we get "4Lf. Korrin Bud", but the contractions are expanded in the page name, to Four-Leaf Korrigan Bud. We know to do this from the title of the item image (Four-leaf korrigan bud), though we never use that directly as the page name.

In the example you cite, it appears in the inventory list as "Morana Pigaches", but that is a space-saving contraction; the item image title makes clear that it's a contraction of Morana's Pigaches, which is hence the appropriate name for the article page.

The item image is correct. To verify it hadn't been updated, I just popped over to Grauberg (S) and was lucky enough to get the drop on the first kill.

https://ffxiclopedia.fandom.com/wiki/Lost_Article?redirect=no should get you there.

I propose keeping two separate pages, one for the in-zone Coalition objective (so a list of positions can be maintained) and one for the key item. Can rename the key item page to something like "Lost Article (Key Item)" to preserve some sanity in the namespace and use Template:Disambig2 to help people find the page they're looking for.

"Lost article" should be the page for the Key Item. Key Items' capitalization is as per the Key Item's title.

"Lost Article" should be the page for the clickable spot in-game. It should list the spots for the 'Recover' assignments.

No disambig tag is needed as the two have links to each other within their own pages.

I only suggested the (Key Item) rename to help people using the search bar, which autocompletes. Seeing two autocompletions, one obviously for a key item, may only be a marginal benefit so I don't insist on it.

Haldarn, when you said that, it refreshed my memory on that point, you are absolutely correct, my bad for thinking of consolidating. Anything that can appear in your Inventory should have its page titled as it appears there, and since key items don't, they're titled like they appear on the in-game icon description thingie. Thanks.

The site's good thanks. A decent number of both regular and one-off contributors. A large amount of usage. The community is for the game as a whole and tends to do most of its interaction in-game, via the subreddit or directly via Discord.

Glad to hear, let me know if you need anything 👍

The fault seems to be with an update to {{Used In}} that User:Karuberu made to modernize the template.

It's his code, so I'll do my best! :)

The curly braces are around undefined quantities. I will add to {{Unity Concord Upgrade}} to throw out where those quants are missing (but I'll go to the NPC now also and get the values for the pages currently in-use with the template.

Thanks!

Cool, sorted. Think I'm gonna tweak those two templates so that the "Unity Concord Upgrade:" bit only appears once, like when there are multiple quests, etc. listed.

Sounds good. Re the braces, I was actually just talking about them being shown on the actual page, not really the template. And yeah, I guess the display line might be a little long, lol.

I'd presume that you'd have to acquire the remaining Vellum you need from a different source now.

• Purchase from the Auction House
• Craft at Leathercraft lv.31
• Find another player who has the craft skill levelled and ask them to make it for you (I can do this if you're on Shiva server, but I can't imagine you'd have much trouble asking around).

Good luck!

Thank you so much! Much appreciated~

Yup, you can go here: https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Adoption:Requests

Hi, so we have: {{JobLevelsPlus}} {{CraftLevels}} {{CombatLevels}}

The last of which is specific to your needs mentioned!

Thank you very much !

Hey Techno, cheers for touching base!

No worries. Message me on here or on Discord if you need anything!

p.s. Did you folks ever end up making the mobile-friendly changes (which I remember were mentioned on Central a while back)? If not, that's something I can help with at some point.

I did float it to a couple of the active admins on the site to see if they were interested, and let them know to contact you back then, but honestly I think that they are more focused on their own projects, which are key to getting the encyclopedia completed data-wise or ensuring clear explanations in articles.

Personally, as I mentioned at the time, I am not a fan of the current mobile implementation due to its limitations and formatting restrictions, though I do keep an eye out in the hope it'll evolve in the future to something functional and appropriate to the site.

It was a big hit to lose Monobook support, and we lost regular and advanced contributions from our oldest and most technical editor because of it. Ironically, he would have been the one happiest to work on a Mobile layout.

That's fair, and sorry to hear about the lost support from Monobook being removed. Makes sense that the admins of the time were busy-- there's a lot to do! If I can help with the mobile skin in any way, let me know...

Sounds good. Noticed you'd not been doing much tech-heavy editing in the last 9mo or so; hope you're doing well! :)

Yep, I've just been busy with other things. I think the loss of the Monobook skin kind of put me off of editing for a while and killed any momentum I had on the projects I was working on.

I think you misunderstand. We're not affiliated with BG Wiki, we're the admins for this site. It's our responsibility to make sure that contributions follow the guidelines for this site.

Please also show a little more respect to those who are actively contributing to the upkeep and maintenance of this site in your discourse with its admins.