No edit summary |
(Comment/Keep) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
'''Comment/Keep''' I am OK with there being no LS pages on the wiki, but they will likely creep in over time. I would not mind them being here so long as they follow a set naming convention (Linkshell:xxxx) and article format. --[[User:Gahoo|Gahoo]] 09:54, 31 July 2006 (EDT) |
'''Comment/Keep''' I am OK with there being no LS pages on the wiki, but they will likely creep in over time. I would not mind them being here so long as they follow a set naming convention (Linkshell:xxxx) and article format. --[[User:Gahoo|Gahoo]] 09:54, 31 July 2006 (EDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Comment/Keep == |
||
| + | |||
| + | I agree with Gahoo. They should be allowed but follow a template and what have you. Keep it short and sweet. |
||
Revision as of 14:33, 31 July 2006
Article for Deletion
Delete Linkshells should not have their own pages in FFXIclopedia for more reasons than I care to mention at this time --Ganiman 20:13, 29 July 2006 (EDT)
Delete If everyone put their LS on the wiki there wouldn't be any room for anything else, not to mention bandwith issues. --Zero 21:06, 29 July 2006 (EDT)
Delete Information contained in a Wiki like this should be accurate and up to date, and I don't see a personal LS remaining that way indefinitely. Also it has no usefulness when looking for FFXI information. --Tha*Lunat!k 21:31, 29 July 2006 (EDT)
Comment: I think this should be deleted, buuuut I think that pages for certain linkshells may be appropriate. Certain linkshells have been around for years, especially some HNMLS's. Sometimes if enough information is available, a page outlining the linkshell, a history of the shell and what it has been through. Possibly a link to its website if it has one (the page should absolutely not be used as a personal page for the linkshell). In cases like that I believe they are appropriate. That way the page would be an encylopedic entry detailing history and purpose, rather than a shout out to your personal linkshell. --Chrisjander 21:50, 29 July 2006 (EDT)
Comment: Alright. Sounds fair. I agree with the person above, allow major linkshells to have their LS posted. Sorry about that ^^ {Please forgive me.} --Revitozu 21:50, 29 July 2006 (EDT)
Comment: But the question is, how do we know if Linkshells have been around long enough or are big enough. Really I belive it's best if we say "No" across the board. --Zero 00:37, 30 July 2006 (EDT)
Delete: In general, I think they are not wiki material. Although I am open to an exception, if one is adequately presented to the community. --Chrisjander 00:43, 30 July 2006 (EDT)
Delete: Seems to me that linkshell info belongs on their own websites. There's also the new linkshell community dealie from Squeenix... --Valyana 01:27, 30 July 2006 (EDT)
Comment/Keep I am OK with there being no LS pages on the wiki, but they will likely creep in over time. I would not mind them being here so long as they follow a set naming convention (Linkshell:xxxx) and article format. --Gahoo 09:54, 31 July 2006 (EDT)
Comment/Keep
I agree with Gahoo. They should be allowed but follow a template and what have you. Keep it short and sweet.