User talk:Leuqarte/Archive 1 (through 9 June 2008)

Images
We do not differentiate between file extensions, as long as the image is in decent quality it's fine. -- 23:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Images for Deletion
Hi, Leuqarte, please embed images on Sdelete templates do I can see the new images when deleting them, use and not "Wind Staff.png". Please go back and fix them if you have time. -- 21:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't undo this by adding a colon, they are SUPPOSED to be embedded on delete tag. -- 00:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Chocobo Raising (color)
An appropriate matter would be to ask and/or explain to the other person that it's just that, a discussion on color...speculation if you will. There's no question on "usefulness" or not, it's the fact that people that were discussing and testing things on the article, which isn't how things are done. The protection is to stop the warring and encourage discussion. -- 00:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

UserWiki talk
Well, User: is basically the space for the social profile, and UserWiki: is for all the userpage content. Wikia told me that UserWiki should function just like User talk and give a yellow notification bar when someone edits the talk page, I was just testing to see if it's working because I noticed you put a User Pics notification on someone's UserWiki talk page, if its not giving the notification, we should continue to use only User talk: until both work one in the same. -- 17:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Yea, if you're logged in and view your talk page the notification will not be there. I'm going to try again, this time don't click the e-mail notif and see if the yellow bar appears. -- 18:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'll make a note of it. -- 21:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Drop Rate
Drop rates don't have to be even to be accurate. Please don't revert useful edits. ~ Karuberu 23:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, this is covered in the disclaimer for the template: "The accuracy of the information is only as reliable as the editors contributing." As much as I'd like to have perfectly pure data, it's pretty much impossible on this site. In fact, that's why we're so intent on collecting so much data; We're trying to "dilute" these potential errors in the data. Reverting every time someone forgets a drop really hinders this process. I try to restrict my reversions to when someone either replaces the entire drop rate, increases the drops without increasing the kills, or clearly makes a mistake/vandalizes the page. ~ Karuberu 07:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

drop rates
Drop rates for EACH item must be updated --> You are taking it a bit to literally. I agree with the reverts you made on the VE page - it makes no sense to increase kill counts on insect wings and not also up the total kills on the hairpin drop. If the reverse were true, that they updated the hairpin and not the insect wing, this would be wrong. Maybe I don't remember or didn't keep track of insect wings I was throwing away, for example. Requiring me to increase kill count on the insect wings would then cause an inaccurate drop rate to be displayed as more people added to it doing the same thing. I'm pointing this out because I've noticed you reverting a lot of drop rate edits and inserting "Edits failing to do so are subject to reversion".. --1.quos.vita.habitum.captivus 22:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)