Talk:Sword Trials

Path Info
Wish I'd thought to include the name of the sword as it changes, because presumably one can only have 1 soulsaber but could maybe can still have soulsaber+antea.

Stats listed as "result" are the base+augments together. I believe all the ones that wind up either 43 or 45 dmg are soulsaber

START > 150 > 151 > 152 > BRANCH (153/158)

153 > 154 > 155 > 156 > 157 RESULT: 47 dmg, 236 delay ..nothing else on it

158 > 159 > BRANCH (160/161)

160 RESULT: 40 dmg, 240 delay, occ. atk. twice

161 > 162 > 163 RESULT: 59 dmg, 228 delay, occ. atk. twice

START > 164 > BRANCH (166/172/178/184/190)

165 > BRANCH

166 > 167 > BRANCH (168/170)

168 > 169 RESULT: 43 dmg, 230 delay, 4 str, 12 attack

170 RESULT: 45 dmg, 234 delay, add.eff.:weakens atk.+10

172 > 173 > BRANCH (174/176)

174 > 175 RESULT: 43 dmg, 230 delay, 4 agi, 12 evasion

176 > 177 RESULT: 45 dmg, 234 delay, add.eff.impairs evasion+10

178 > 179 > BRANCH (180/182)

180 > 181 RESULT: 43 dmg, 230 delay, 4 dex, 8 accuracy

182 > 183 RESULT: 45 dmg, 234 delay, add.eff.lowers acc.+10

184 > 185 > BRANCH (186/188)

186 > 187 RESULT: 43 dmg, 230 delay, 4 chr, mag.evasion+10

188 > 189 RESULT: 45 dmg 234 delay, add.eff.lowers mag.eva.+10

190 > BRANCH (191/197/203/209

191 > 192 > BRANCH (193/195)

193 > 194 RESULT: 43 dmg, 230 delay, 4 int, mag.atk.bns.+5

195 > 196 RESULT: 45 dmg, 234 delay, add.eff.:Lowers mag.atk.+10

197 > 198 BRANCH (199/201)

199 > 200 RESULT: 43 dmg, 230 delay, 4 vit, phys. dmg. taken -5%

201 >202 RESULT: 45 dmg, 234 delay, add.eff.:Weakens def.+10

203 > 204 > BRANCH (205/207)

205 > 206 RESULT: 43 dmg, 230 delay, 4 mnd, mag.def.bns.+5

207 > 208 RESULT: 45 dmg, 234 delay, add.eff.:lowers mag.def.+10

209 > 210 (BRANCH 211/213)

211 > 212 RESULT: 43 dmg, 230 delay, 30 mp, magic accuracy +10

213 > 214 RESULT: 45 dmg, 234 delay, add.eff.:lowers mag.acc.+10

I have no idea how that should be formatted but I think we out to have some kind of "how to get where you want to end up" rather than a separate page for every trial like a few people seem to have started. --PollyWog 01:23, March 24, 2010 (UTC)