User talk:Tahngarthor

Ah, Update day
This is why they keep us around, isn't it Tahn? --Lordshadow 20:10, March 22, 2010 (UTC) (Also, is vanachat down?)

Bombs, Snolls and Djinn
Per your comment. If you could check Pankration that would be helpful. Thanks. -- 16:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Done- No known snoll can be used in Pankration, while any bomb can. If they were both considered part of the same category, they would both be useable. Tahngarthor 17:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Golden Salvage
Thanks for your comment in the discussion of my guide. I have made a pretty large overhaul of the article, including some new sections, and I believe that it is much clearer now. Feel free to let me know what you think!Resheph 09:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Support Job pages
I see you replaced 'level' with 'main job level' on the warrior support page. That's a good idea, thanks. --Volkai 14:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Signature
Please remove that giant substituted template from your signature. Thanks. -- 03:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

? I dont recall making anything like that.... wonder how it got that way. lemme see what I can do. Tahngarthortalk-contribs 04:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. You need to add a ]] after the pipeline in [[User:Tahngarthor| btw. -- 05:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Fields of Valor revert
I'm wondering why you reverted my edits to the FoV page. I don't see what's wrong with my modifications: (1) it is proper to link to the Field Manual page here when talking about them; (2) the manuals aren't always next to outposts; (3) 'exact' shouldn't be capitalised as it doesn't begin a new sentence; and (4) what's wrong with actually linking to the chart being referenced?-- 11:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't see the point to linking to a page that is nothing but a data source which is transcluding information onto the FoV page. The manual locations are listed in the table and the text now specifies " (Exact locations are shown in the table below.)" Also, you can have entire sentences in parentheses so captializing exact is acceptable. The link is redundant. If it were a reference to an off site source, it would be appropriate. But identical content within the same site is redundant. Tahngarthor talk-contribs 13:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Capitalising 'exact' would be acceptable if it was the entire sentence, but the period to end the preceding sentence doesn't appear until after the parentheses. The link isn't "identical content", it's a shortcut to the table. Should the TOC be removed too for the same reason?-- 21:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It's a "shortcut" to identical content. For the umpteenth time, the two pages say exactly the same thing, except one has a couple additional sentences of text. I don't understand the resistance here. Usually the wiki frowns upon redundancy and other unnecessary stuff. Correct grammar all you want, nobody's perfect. but I maintain the FM page in its current form is unnecessary. I'd be more inclined to support the page and the transclusion of it if it were going to be used on multiple pages, but as it is now I don't see that happening due to the nature of it- the table is useful on this page and this page only. Tahngarthor talk-contribs 23:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * This isn't a discussion about the Field Manual page, it's about the FoV page; and while the FM page still exists in its current state, the wiki should be edited as such (and not with the assumption that it's going to disappear). If the FM page is removed/merged/whatever, then the FoV page can be updated to reflect that.-- 01:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It still makes no sense to link to it, whether it dissapears or not- in its current state, the Field Manual page is little more than a chart template (filled in with content) and it does not help anyone to link there from the FoV page. If something isn't helpful, it shouldn't be done. And linking from FoV to the FM page is not helpful to anyone. Tahngarthor talk-contribs 01:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

hmm
I like this concept alot, it really seems to highlight ur additions to talk pages, mind if i borrow or play around w/ the source? Milotheshort 23:15, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

p.s. i already have the source duplicated, just wanted to make sure you were cool about me trying to implment/alter it on my page, some ppl are touchy about pet projects like this lol thx in advance Milotheshort 23:17, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Please don't use this, I'll only be using it in certain cases and I've been informed that this template of a template concept can be problematic if overused. Tahngarthor talk-contribs 06:32, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Actualization Team
Were you using Maze Rune 102 (Trial by Numbers)? The Blitz is only locked if that rune is set (or so another editor claims; I have yet to try it out myself). If you used 102 and had Chaperix use a Blitz without completing that quest, then that part of the page will need some more revising. ~ Karuberu 23:19, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Bard songs box template
The links you reverted (back in November - I didn't have it watchlisted) were there because there are pages for song types as well as for individual songs. Now the template no longer has links to the song-type pages Elegy Lullaby Mazurka March Prelude Mambo Madrigal Pastoral or Operetta. --Volkai 20:08, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

1) the wohle point of the template is to link to the spells themselves; 2) anything you really need to know about the song type can be found on the spell pages (e.g. the effects of the spell), and 3) The way the links were set up, it was very easy to click the wrong link since it isn't immediately obvious that the two words link to different pages. It should remain as it is. Tahngarthor talk-contribs 00:49, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

Weaknesses
Please take a look at http://wiki.ffxiclopedia.org/wiki/Category:Abyssea#Weakness_Targeting for the information you wanted on the weaknesses, it is suggested that finding the mobs weakness will help drop rates. To know you found the weakness !! will appear over the mobs head. --Icari 10:48, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

If triggering these things is not proven to *make* it drop, then drop rate is still necessary. Putting that icon next to the key item drop may be misleading. Tahngarthor 17:05, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Gatherer of Light (I)

 * Hey there! Can i ask you why Gatherer of Light (I) locked is? --Ayrtonia 17:48, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * want to put a link to the german wikipage pls --Ayrtonia 11:12, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * or if it is possible that you could share it [ [de:Das kataklystische Lied - Teil 1] ] tyvm --Ayrtonia 11:18, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks and have a nice week! --Ayrtonia 23:21, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Watching over things
You are welcome --Icari 18:29, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

My Contributions
I've been doing a lot of page editing for consistency in both format and convention. I've also been cleaning up various categories. In the process, I've run into many pages that are named incorrectly. I've been adding Move, SMove, Delete and SDelete as needed. However, the creator of one page removed one. In order to avoid an edit war, I'm contacting you.

Trail 2083 is incorrectly named. I was originally going to add a Move, but Trial 2083 already exists. So, I added a SDelete instead. Today, the creator removed it. Can you please take a look at it? Also, when you have time, please look at the various maintenance categories.

Thank you! -- 16:34, December 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking care of that page. Unfortunately, the person just added it back again. -- 17:48, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Naming Conventions
Hello, I noticed that you reverted my edit on the The Wyrm God page with the comment "Do not capitalize all words in a key item name", for the Crimson Traverser Stone key item. However, all key items are capitalized that way (or at least, they should...), just like all the other articles. The naming conventions say : "Articles names should use proper capitalization, like that of a book title, this includes redirects. Example: Arnold The Bear is incorrect; it should be Arnold the Bear". So I changed the The Wyrm God article again, to follow those naming conventions, and to avoid having someone create the article with improper capitalization... --Soily 16:52, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Your change has been reverted, please do not change it back. I placed an explanation on your talk page. Tahngarthor talk-contribs 21:02, December 20, 2010 (UTC)